HS2- cost vs benefits Dissertation Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

HS2- cost vs benefits - Dissertation ExampleTABLE 1 Report of HSR Documents in the UK course of study REPORT AUTHOR KEY NOTES February, 2004 High hurrying Rail International comparisons Commission for Integrated transport (CfIT) Geographical and demographic factors created differences in international markets. The current complainway net income in Britains network was in order. The check network substance was good. 2005 High Speed Line Study WS Atkins A think made on overcrowding of lines. There was need for investment in HSR with a check on scotch wooing. 2016 proposed as the opening date for the project. December, 2006 The Eddington Transport Study Sir Rod Eddington The long distance data links never provided disclose connectivity in relation to the local connections that are short distanced. Doubts on real benefits of HSR considered. HSR could non reduce nose candy emission. Other viable options for transport in long distances considered of lower costs than HSR. June , 2007 HS2 Proposition, the WCRL corridor Greengauge21 Due to capacity shortfall, HS2 proposed as the best option to solve the crisis. The costs earlier predicted about HSR seen as not logical. HSR network offered a continuation for HS1. A growth predicted on demand for WCML which will boost connection in the corridor and boost economic growth. January, 2009 High Speed Two Department for Transport The new politics to consider construction of HS2. HS2 Company to be created so that it deals with network planning. HSR to address the problem of overcrowding. September, 2009 The case for new lines Network Rail A network configuration and service pattern proposal created. capital of the United Kingdom was considered to be the main area in focus. WCML was the first HST alignment to be built. September, 2009 A step in advance Greengauge21... This research will begin with the background knowledge on high amphetamine rail. The high speed rail entered the UK in 2007 following the completion of Channel Tunnel to London. It was called Channel Tunnel Rail Link, soon referred to as High-Speed 1 or HS1. A political consensus on the construction of HSR network in UK for trains running with a maximum speed of 350 kmph is currently preferred. The next project is the construction of High Speed 2 that will connect London and the northern parts of UK. According to UK transport policy, HS2 is viewed as the most appropriate mode of transport for the region in relation to the increased demand for rail network and transport. An extensive study on the program in the year 2004 by different countries in the world revealed that UK had not implemented the High-Speed rail. Other countries like Germany, Japan, France and Spain had already adopted it. The study revealed that UK had not seen the need for High-Speed rail because of demand in the transport sector. The available modes of transport were in a position to hold the capacity. Several reports drawn from the table show that a growing demand for rail transport cannot be met with the current network and therefore a viable solution should be seek to hold the situation. A further forecast for the future has enhanced its implementation. The reason backing HS2 was deficiency of capacity in UK rail network. The proposal for HS2 by Rail Network was after wide-awake consideration on possible alternatives using WCML alignment.