Monday, February 4, 2019
Genetic Engineering: Monsatos Roundup Ready Soybeans :: Exploratory Essays Research Papers
Roundup Ready Soybean (RRS) is an intelligent solution in estimate of the environment, claims Monsanto, the agricultural chemical company that makes genetically engineered RRS (Greenpeace). Likewise, U.S. Food and Drug institution (FDA) claims it Roundup Ready Soybean does not require premarket approval and the special labeling of it is inappropriate (Whitmore). present tense we can find information about genetically modified fare anywhere. However, many people have been poorly informed about genetic engineering. This is because developers of genetically engineering and the U.S. government put pressure on usual information. In other words, they only give good information to the semipublic and hide unpleasant facts. It seems that genetically engineered foods have nothing different from internal ones, and are not harmful. However, genetically engineering is dangerous. Because more than half(a) the farmers leave behind no longer be able to make their living secondly, the trul y merits of genetically engineering are dangerous lastly, there are no laws which protect our right.   First, I am opposed to genetically engineered food because half the worlds farmers can no longer make their living. This is because they will not be able to afford to debase seeds (Edwards 22). Up to the present, farmers could gather seeds up from the surf and replant them neighboring year. However, many genetically engineered seeds are made to give rise only one growing season. Melvin Oliver, who works in the USDAs (US Department of Agriculture) science lab in Lubbock, Texas, and invented genetically engineered seeds, claims that genetically engineered seed is a way of self-policing the self-appointed use of American technology (Edwards 22). Monsanto also insists that because Roundup Ready Soybeans are patented, their trustworthy use is different from that of other general soybeans (Monsanto). But these claims only depict one-way thinking which mainly aims at the pr ofit of companies. If farmers have to obtain the seeds every year, poorer farmers will no longer be able to buy them. What is worse, this might be dangerous with regards to the environment. If most of the farmers buy these seeds, natural seeds will disappear. What if companies go bankrupt and can not make the seeds that cannot be replanted next year? Farmers will not be able to make line up and we will surely have nothing to eat. Developers cannot assure that this will neer happen.   Moreover, the price of genetically engineered seeds will become higher. At first, these seeds will be cheaper than general ones to encourage poorer farmers to buy them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment