One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich Dehumanization Essay

The brisk unrivaled Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich follows the life of a captive in a Siberian labor plurality during the communist period. Although the novel only describes angiotensin converting enzyme day in the life of this captive, the author succeeds at fashioning the motifs that occur most likely every day clear to the reader. A major motif in the novel One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich scripted by Alexander Solzhenitsyn is dehumanization Ivan Denisovich Shukhov is striped of his humanity because he is localise similarly to the way an animal would be extended.He is given instruction manual every second of the day, and has no say in how to live his life. dehumanisation occurs when people view others as less than human, therefore not self-aggrandising them the moral respect they deserve as humans. In this particular Stalinist labor camping ground, in which the main character Ivan Denisovich Shukhov is imprisoned, the officers are instructed to attack the prisoners dignity, therefore they are taking away their humanity, get bying them like they would sell a cattle, not people. As soon as the novel begins, so does Shukhovs day.When he opens his eyes, he already knows how the day will proceed, because each(prenominal) days are the same. He must go for breakfast at the same time every other prisoner does. This shows that he doesnt switch a say in when to do things, even much(prenominal) a basic need that many take for granted. Yet he does not complain, this is due to the fact that food is valuable to him and he has restrict access to it. The prisoners are not only instructed when to eat, but they also deplete to compete for food, the same way a group of chickens would fight for round grain.This fact is clearly shown when the narrator describes the scene shortly before Shukhov receives his meal, the touch on shouted through the hatch, and people were shoving at him from the other side (86). This shows how the workers have to fi ght to their food, as if they were savages. The cooks treat the men like one would treat a dog throwing food among a large crowd, thus making the dogs fight for their food. This is inhumane and takes away the prisoners dignity.It is just one of the many meals that Shukhov will have during his stay in the labor camp that represent the motif of dehumanization, and not only that, also humiliation. As humiliate as it is, the prisoners are grateful for any type of meal they get, A area of thin cabbage soup, half burned, was as welcome to them as rain to parched earth. Theyd swallow it in one gulp. That bowl of soupit was dearer than freedom, dearer than life itself, past, present, and future (126). The prisoners minds are set the way an animals mind is, they only think about food, and it is their main crusade for living.They have stepped to the level of an animal and lost their humanity and any hold in achieving anything else in their life. Another way in which the prisoners in this novel were dehumanized was the fact that they could not own anything that the officers found too dangerous. However, the officers took proceeds of this and would not give the laborers any freedom. For example, Shukhov had to hide a loaf of prick in his mattress so he doesnt get punished in one of the daily searches, Stich, stich, stich, and the little tear in the mattress was ended, with the bread obscure under it (25).This proves that the prisoners feared the officers, and the consequences that would come with not following the directions. Another way that the prisoners identicalness was taken away from them was that they were assigned numbers for well-off identification, in an effort to dehumanize them. By numbering them they were once again treated like animals, a way that cows are labeled on a farm, and not like individual humans. To continue, officers in the camp play a big role in the dehumanization act of the prisoners. The officers are in charge and treat the workers without any respect.The guards use strained labor and cruelty to dehumanize the workers. This is shown when the narrator himself compares the workers to animals, the fellows bringing the mortar were wind like horses (124). The prisoners were not only compared to horses, but also mules, hawks, and wolves. The officers treated the workers as if they were animals, therefore, they did not see them as human beings. This is shows when the narrators says, He wouldnt treat us like human beings now let him burst himself yelling (118).The officers looked at the prisoners as less than humans. The officers were the ones that took away the prisoners identity and humanity In conclusion, a key motif in the novel, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich written by Alexander Solzhenitsyn is dehumanization. Prisoners in this novel are treated not as humans should be treated but as animals. They are gathered in crowds to be fed and counted. In this way the officers strip them of their identity and their humanity. Leaving derriere only humiliation and disrespect.